Home  ›  News  ›

FTC Drops Cram-Hammer On T-Mobile

Article Comments  7  

Jul 1, 2014, 1:39 PM   by Eric M. Zeman
updated Jul 1, 2014, 1:50 PM

The Federal Trade Commission today filed a complaint regarding T-Mobile's billing practices for premium third-party services. The FTC alleges that T-Mobile made millions of dollars by allowing companies to tack high monthly fees onto its customers' bills, while often pocketing 30% to 40% of those fees. The practice is often referred to as cramming. The FTC alleges that T-Mobile knew about potential fraudulent charges made against its customers in 2012, but didn't begin to take action until 2013. The complaint suggests T-Mobile often hid third-party charges in lengthy and difficult-to-understand monthly bills. The FTC also believes T-Mobile didn't provide customers with full refunds, flat-out refused to refund some customers, and in some cases told customers to recoup the charges directly from the scammers - without providing the pertinent contact details. "It's wrong for a company like T-Mobile to profit from scams against its customers when there were clear warning signs the charges it was imposing were fraudulent" said FTC Chairwoman Edith Ramirez. "The FTC's goal is to ensure that T-Mobile repays all its customers for these crammed charges." The FTC wants a court order to permanently prevent T-Mobile from engaging in mobile cramming, to obtain refunds for consumers, and to relieve T-Mobile of its ill-gotten gains. The FTC's story differs significant from the one told by T-Mobile. Late last year, the company said it tried to police premium SMS services, but too many of its partners were breaking the rules. T-Mobile discontinued premium SMS services across its network in late 2013, and agreed to refund some customers. T-Mobile recently reminded customers to check their eligibility for those refunds. T-Mobile's efforts on behalf of its customers appear not to have dissuaded the FTC from taking its own action.

Related

more news about:

T-Mobile
 

Comments

This forum is closed.

This forum is closed.

Globhead

Jul 1, 2014, 2:09 PM

Thanks, FTC...

For filing a complaint in 2014 over things which happened in 2012 and T-Mobile announced they would refund in 2013. And which, for all we know, other carriers are still doing.
Globhead said:
For filing a complaint in 2014 over things which happened in 2012 and T-Mobile announced they would refund in 2013. And which, for all we know, other carriers are still doing.

Um, no. AT&T, Sprint along with
...
(continues)
Tofuchong

Jul 1, 2014, 5:28 PM

..lengthy and difficult-to-understand monthly bills..

As a T-Mobile representative, I take these allegations seriously. On a T-Mobile bill, after the details about calls placed / received, and if you have detailed billing turned on, the details about all text messages sent / received, on the very next page, before you move onto the next line, are the listed premium service charges.

I can't for the life of me figure out how this could be construed as lengthy or difficult to understand. They were printed on the bills in plain english, the charge, a description of it, and the cost associated with it. It's one of the easiest things to find on any T-Mobile bill.
It is lengthy and difficult to understand because there is numbers on a page. Numbers! Do you have any idea how confusing that is to the average T-mobile customer that just wants to get there phone cut back on! Think of all that bidness they are missi...
(continues)
...
Charles Bigelow

Jul 1, 2014, 2:03 PM

Figures.....

No wonder their plans and prices are so competitive. 🤣
 
 
Page  1  of 1

Subscribe to news & reviews with RSS Follow @phonescoop on Threads Follow @phonescoop on Mastodon Phone Scoop on Facebook Follow on Instagram

 

Playwire

All content Copyright 2001-2024 Phone Factor, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Content on this site may not be copied or republished without formal permission.