<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Phone Scoop - UTStarcom CDM-7075 / CDM-220 Info</title> 
    <link>http://www.phonescoop.com/</link> 
    <description>Phone Scoop is a comprehensive resource for mobile phone enthusiasts, professionals, shoppers, and users. This feed contains status updates and user reviews for the UTStarcom CDM-7075 / CDM-220.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Copyright 2013 Phone Scoop. All rights reserved.</copyright> 
    
    <item>
      <title>User Review: WOULD NOT BUY, 2 REPLACEMENTS</title>
      <link>http://phonescoop.com/phones/user_reviews.php?phone=902&amp;r=38342#review38342</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://phonescoop.com/phones/user_reviews.php?phone=902&amp;r=38342#review38342</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 01:26:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <description> &lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;narn3049 submitted this review of the UTStarcom CDM-7075 / CDM-220:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Overall rating: &lt;b&gt;1&lt;/b&gt; (out of 5)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I got the original phone, LOVING all of the features, but when I went to activate it wouldn't made me a little ticked as I did a NE2 for it, second phone received and I COULD not receive calls, or get txts, or even do anything, but it was activated. Stay away from the 7075&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;(Follow link to rate this review or report it to us as inappropriate.)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://phonescoop.com/phones/p_forum.php?ff=902</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>User Review: Solid Little Phone</title>
      <link>http://phonescoop.com/phones/user_reviews.php?phone=902&amp;r=22683#review22683</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://phonescoop.com/phones/user_reviews.php?phone=902&amp;r=22683#review22683</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:22:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <description> &lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;millfred submitted this review of the UTStarcom CDM-7075 / CDM-220:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Overall rating: &lt;b&gt;4.5&lt;/b&gt; (out of 5)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This phone is a very solid feature filled entry level phone.  I got one for my daughter on a NE2 purchase.  She burns between 2000 and 3000 minutes per month (mostly IN).  I am taking into account how little I pay for it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The camera is neither a pro or con, you get what you pay for.  If you want to take pictures with this phone then simply view them on the phone's display.  Expecting more would be silly.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Pros:&lt;br /&gt;- Very good sound quality both on send and receive.  Better than a Moto e815 we have in the family&lt;br /&gt;- Does s better job on with signal level than my high priced Samsung&lt;br /&gt;- It looks OK&lt;br /&gt;- Lots of features for such a entry level device&lt;br /&gt;- Speaker phone works OK&lt;br /&gt;- Battery life is normal, charge every couple of days&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Cons:&lt;br /&gt;- I know I said this thing is an entry level but it I can't understand why Verizon does not offer VZ Nav on this thing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you are looking for a good low priced entry level phone this one fits the bill.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;(Follow link to rate this review or report it to us as inappropriate.)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://phonescoop.com/phones/p_forum.php?ff=902</comments>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
