Samsung Surpasses Motorola in the U.S.
Article
Comments 13
Nov 7, 2008, 9:07 AM by Eric M. Zeman
Motorola lost the number one handset provider position to Samsung after its market share fell in the third quarter to 21.1%. Samsung made gains and grabbed 22.4%, edging out Motorola for the top spot. Motorola had been number one in the U.S. since 2004.
Reuters »
Samsung?!?!?!
Samsung must be selling all these phones to their GSM customers because their CDMA phones are utter crap, bad reception, poor build quality, and often they'll lose service permantly (like the SCH-a870...worst Samsung phone ever built). Honestly, I'm surprised LG hasn't taken this spot considering they are about 90% of what I sell..of course I work for Verizon which has a love affair with LG so that might be why.
I wonder how much of this has to do with the Instinct?
I don't work for Verizon but have family members that do. They have said the same thing as you have. They claim that the glide has issues and that LG is definitely a hit for them. however, most Samsung phones are actually very formidable and the insti...
(continues)
As previously said, Samsung phones are not crap. This is the same mentality that Motorola fanatics used all throughout 200 and into 2007 about Samsung phones. They'd call them "Samsuck", garbage...This was around the time when Motorola was gaining US ...
(continues)
Is Moto still good?
I don't currently own a Motorola but thought about upgrading to one. I have the LG 8350 right now. It appears that Moto is hurting itself by lagging in innovation. If this is all it is than I may still get a Moto. I've always thought their quality was decent. I'm thinking about getting the Moto Rapture VU30. Any comments on this?
The newer Motorola models have been great so far, the Rapture is a good choice.
You can only sell so many RAZR's...
🤣