Sprint: AT&T and T-Mobile Merger Would Create Duopoly
Apr 19, 2011, 4:24 PM by Eric M. Zeman
Sprint held a conference call this afternoon in an attempt to cast some spin on comments made about CEO Dan Hesse by AT&T. On April 15, Hesse made comments regarding Sprint's opposition to the AT&T/T-Mobile merger. AT&T responded with a post on its policy blog, saying that Hesse's remarks were off-base, and not consistent with its past position regarding mergers and acquisitions, and the competitive nature of the market. Sprint representative John Taylor said that AT&T's blog post was an attempt to mislead the public on Sprint's position. Taylor says that Sprint favors mergers and acquisitions, but not in the case of AT&T and T-Mobile, which it repeatedly said would create an imbalanced duopoly (AT&T/T-Mobile and Verizon Wireless) in the U.S. Sprint said that the merger will reduce competition, slow innovation, increase consumer pricing, and won't lead to any real consumer benefit. Sprint says the merger won't lead to LTE in rural areas, nor will it improve coverage in urban areas, as AT&T and T-Mobile's GSM networks almost entirely overlap. Sprint said it will continue to "raise the alarm" about the merger, which it firmly believes should not happen. It expects U.S. governmental regulators to see past what it called AT&T's attempts to distract the public. AT&T is expected to file official paperwork with the FCC this week. The FCC has promised the deal will undergo a thorough review.
source: Sprint
Comments
Just suppose this worked out for the consumer
The only real issue with consumers as I see it, are the plans. They're expensive and if the larger ...
(continues)
"for Tmobile to divide their assests and break them up into regions and have an auction or sorts"
a little hard for the little guys because you have...
(continues)
Dan Hesse is a brilliant, customer focused CEO & Sprint RULES!!!
(continues)
I have zero respect for Sprint after their ignorant cry for government intervention.
No one but a card-carrying socialist would ever logical...
(continues)
quit your cryin
edzero said:
Im so tired of hearing Sprint cry about this sale. Calling it a duopoly before it even happens is like they're giving up the fight before the fight has even started
Try this one. Quit your yappin'. U...
(continues)
I still don't get this whole merger thing.
I agree with everything except for the whole "duopoly" thing...
Please don't allow the government to get involved in this stuff. It's insane!
You want faster Internet on your phone? let this go through!
You want better coverage? let this go through!
You want more competition and innovation??? LET THIS GO THROUGH!!!
Who is so unbelievably blinded by irrational fear that they honestly believe that this merger will not be good for everyone??
Do we really need the government to step in and stifle competitive moves like the one AT&T is making??
Has anyone actually paid attention? Anyone read some logical arguments on this? Or economics in general???
Is ANYONE here actually knowledgeable on this topic?
Atlas Shrugged.......
(continues)
(continues)
Troll-Bait said:
You want faster Internet on your phone? let this go through!
You want better coverage? let this go through!
You want more competition and innovation??? LET THIS GO THROUGH!!!
I hope that you are...
(continues)
(continues)
(continues)
Sick of Sprint's lies...
(continues)
they dont knwo how to execute on any plans. i thought the merger between nextel and sprint would be fantastic, and that if they would execute their plans it work work; boy was i a...
(continues)
(continues)
Silly Sprint
Why don't you put the money you're using to fight the merger to much better use like improving your crappy WiMAX network or doing a deal with LightSquared.
Cause honestly, Sprint you're in over your heads. Ma Bell will eat you alive and when she's through, you're gonna begging for Big Red to save you only Big Red doesn't need or want you.
(continues)
(continues)
I commend his stand on the truth behi...
(continues)
(continues)
"AT&T and T-Mobile's GSM networks almost entirely overlap. "
New Development
wvucraig said:...
WASHINGTON, DC - Sprint CEO Dan Hesse has announced that in an effort to stop the impending doom that the AT&T-mobile merger will cause, he is traveling to the FCC on Monday to throw a temper tantrum on the sidewalk
(continues)
That Is Competition!
renato3gs said:
It is a harsh reality but somehow Sprint has to work very hard to compete. π
Why work hard when you can get the government help out?
Sprint: "we are an insignificant company who cannot compete"
Where do you find that quote?
John B.
ajac09 said:
Cant compete so he cries.
No one else can effectively compete when two companies are cornering the market.
AJ
(continues)
rural LTE is just a ploy -- see the maps
http://www.mobilizeeverything.com/ »
On this web site, AT&T displays supposed future LTE coverage maps. Side by side, one map depicts future LTE coverage under the current plan, another depicts future LTE coverage if the merger is approved. AT&T claims that the merger can allow it to use T-Mobile spectrum to expand LTE coverage to rural areas. Unfortunately, that claim is, at best, a half truth, at worst, an outright lie.
Comparison of the supposed future LTE coverage maps with current AT&T coverage maps shows that AT&T would deploy LTE only where it has existing Cellular 850 MHz and/or PCS 1900 MHz coverage. In fact, the propagation characteristics & coverage holes...
(continues)
Gov seems to care mostly about the rural areas.
P.S. I'm still hoping you can take a look at this one and tell me what I'm missing.
https://www.phonescoop.com/news/discuss.php?fm=m&ff= ... »
(continues)
Blah, blah, blah...
Dan, we all know you're only worried about Sprint being left in the dust.
But he has a point. It would create a duopoly. I'm against this merger.