FCC Approves 3G Nokias, Cingular Does Not
Nokia N80
How does this approval map to the approvals discussed on the following site
http://www.symplification.com/taxonomy/term/60 »
Thanks
earl/fitzco
After looking at these links, to be honest, I think Cingular is making a mistake... it's a slick looking phone, with a lot of cool stuff you can see just by l...
(continues)
So NOW how long is it going to be...
While I understand the reasoning behind this, I am just very dissappointed that my wait is going to be significantly longer for one of these phones. I had posted the question in another part of the forum about looking for a time frame for these 2 phones (N80 & 6282) to be released, and now that a light appears, it is snuffed out.
Does anyone have any clue as to when the NEWER versions of these phones will be available...this year (from Cingular that is)?? This Quarter??
I understand that there is really not much RELIABLE info on this, but I was just looking for a more informed opinion of when I might be able to get my hands on one of these puppies.
In a related question, assuming no one has any kind of edu...
(continues)
(continues)
So Video Calling or Not?
Why these versions got FCC approval
Just read your news article bout the n80 and 6282. From your article it seems Nokia is creating another version of these phones for cingular. But it would also seem as if this original version is still going to be put out by nokia, as why else would they have gone thru the process of having them fcc certified?
...because it is a many-month process that was almost certainly started by Nokia before Cingular told them to go back and add WCDMA 850.
Plus the N80 also has WCDMA 2100 and will be released overseas in that version, with WCDMA 1900 potentially for 3G roaming...
(continues)