Apple Sues HTC Over Patents
HTC = Heavy Taiwanese Crap
They have the saddest excuse for quality control I've ever seen as well. Look no further than the issues with the Nexus One (I'm not talking just about the 3G Radio issues either.)
I don't know what drugs one must consume to support HTC but if so I'd like to know where I can buy some. ๐คฃ
Anyway, good for Apple. Without HTC phones we'll reduce clutter in our landfills.
bluecoyote said:...
HTC is a smartphone maker so friggin horrible they didn't even put their own name on the device so they wouldn't have to support them.
They have the saddest excuse for quality control I've ever seen as well. Lo
(continues)
HTC makes a lot of quality PDAs, including Dell X50v and X51v and HP RX3000 series. Over 50% of PDA/smartphone models are made from HTC.
Horrible News For Palm
However Apple is either waiting for Palm to die (cheaper), or is going to wait until it stings the most. There's no denying Palm's WebOS flagrantly copies from a LOT of the iPhone's OS.
I hope Jeff Ruby's got some licensing agreement in the works, because I don't think Apple's going to go too easy after Palm's whole USB spat.
They are doing this to try and stall competition, nothing more.
It's Protectionist Garbage.. If every software company sued whenever another company borrowed an idea, N...
(continues)
Filing a claim against Palm would most definitely result in a counter claim against Apple with as many...
(continues)
The "patents" Apple is claiming (I don't know why they don't just sue every electronics maker)
Notice: My legalise is a bit rusty.. but I think these are what the patents translate into. Feel free to correct it if you're more versed than I.
Here is an example of the text:
An apparatus for enabling an object-oriented application to access in an object-oriented manner a procedural operating system having a native procedural interface is disclosed
1. Using a Gesture on the touchscreen to unlock (aka swipe to unlock)
2. Slide Transitions between windows (aka, that it looks pretty when you go from one window/app to the next)
3. On screen keyboards.. That's right, Apple is claiming the patent for USING A ...
(continues)
e.g.:
Sure, we didn't invent the Internet, we didn't invent phones, we didn't invent the I...
(continues)
Take for example the keyboard patent. Apple isn't just patenting an onscreen keyboard but is instead patenting how the ...
(continues)
exactly Menno! apparently Apple invented user interfaces; nay, input / output! i guess i better throw away my microwave, those patent infringing jerks!
Delaware baby
2 hours from the mountains
1 1/2 from DE, MD, NJ Beaches
2 hours from B-more
15 min. from Philly
3 hours from NYC
Thats right!!!!!!!!
Apple really is going after Google.
This is an indirect attempt from Apple to go after Google. The reason they don't go after Google directly is Google could seriously hurt Apple financially. This is an indirect way for Apple to hinder Google's attempt at entering the smart-phone industry. I would bet money that Google will "behind the scenes" help HTC as this provides a rare opportunity for them to go after Apple without any risk of loss to themselves. And when Apple gets desperate enough to go after Google directly, or ...
(continues)
PULLED all links that went to or about apple computers/phones/ect....
Think...about the weight Google has on information FLOW.
Apple Will want to settle...This is a cash grab
Only around 20% of these cases ever end up in a judgment.
Less then 4% of these types of lawsuits go to jury.
81% of what DID go to jury(not bench)ended up in favor of the defendant.
What is tricky is if HTC was found not guilty of 15 and found guilty of 5 that is still "in favor" of apple but that would change the landscape as we know it , THAT would indeed hurt Apples chances against Google.
Its a hard thing to PROVE patent infringement when it gets in front of a jury.
Apple is not going for the "kill" ....that is a weird line of thinking...and well...wrong...
If apple wanted to KILL right now....they would target Google.
Apple Wants to damage android by takeing out a hardware...
(continues)
All aspects target Android implementations
These are all legitimate patents Apple applied for while developing the iPhone- they're the real deal, folks.
The '331 Patent, entitled "Time-Based, Non-Constant Translation Of User Interface Objects Between States," was duly and legally issued on April 22, 2008 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
The '949 Patent, entitled "Touch Screen Device, Method, And Graphical User Interface For Determining Commands By Applying Heuristics," was duly and legally issued on January 20, 2009 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. A copy of the '949 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit B.
The '381 Patent, entitled "List Scrolling And Doc...
(continues)
Apple is basically saying that only they are allowed to make Touchscreen phones, which is idiotic. You shouldn't be able to pate...
(continues)
Apple's Patents Explained for you HTC Fanboys
1) The Unlock Screen Patent
Before the iPhone, name a single phone that used gestures of any kind to unlock a phone. None. Zip. Nada. This was a concept introduced entirely with the iPhone. LG had a "tap to unlock" feature for their junky touch screens, but this doesn't fall under the definition of "gesture" (at least yet.)
This may seem obvious- "HOW AM I SUPPOSED TO UNLOCK MY PHONE SCREEN?" Yet the point remains, nobody did it before Apple- they relied on a hard key.
RIM has a similar patent covering its holsters which use magnets to lock and unlock the screen. Want to know ho...
(continues)
More proof that this is nothing more than a PR move
2) Apple doesn't see any middle ground here.
3) They're not doing any backdoor deals ala Broadcom, etc.
Facts about Apple
1. What was the first phone device that used touchscreen?
2. Who was the first computer company that used touchscreen?
3. Who was the first phone company that used a OS as a platform?
4. When was the first touchscreen phone sold?
5. When was the first touchscreen pda sold?
6. When was the first phone with icons sold?
The reason I ask, is that all of these were created before Jan 07 when Apple announced there IPHONE.
So how can apple sue over something that they didnt create?
They aren't suing HTC because their phones are PDA's
They aren't suing HTC because they use icons.
Steve Jobs is a crybaby
Apple's products are "magical" right? then why the mundane lawsuit over a company that barely sells one/gazillionth the phones the iPhone does? (I'm looking at you blueballs) explain that to me.
๐ข
HTC Doesn't.
HTC (And Google) saw what Apple did and tried to mimick it as much as possible. So basically, they want to just take ...
(continues)
Steve Jobs is the thief, HE SHOULD BE SUED!
Hey Steve Jobs
maybe ...
๐
apple has been stealing technology since the early 80s
2) The iPhone was stolen in the early 90's? A phone that debuted in 2007 was stolen in the early 90's?
๐คจ
(continues)
Androids rule Iphones Blue. /endthread
I can download a song, over the Air, FREE, to my phone and I own it. I can then Bluetooth it to someone, put on my computer, give to anyone. (IMusic app in market).
I can choose and do(with exceptional glee) to root and overclock my droid to run at a solid & stable 1Ghz making it even faster than I can believe. 1.2Ghz if I wish making it faster than the Nexus One. (Sholes & SETcpu in market)
It has FREE VOICE turn by turn directions with Google Navigation. Its so much better than the charged apps on Verizon/ATT. The detailed precision of recalcu...
(continues)
HA
Thank Google for Android
VIVA LA OPEN SOURCE!
(continues)