Nokia E50
carrier?
Why would T-Mo want it? They have the BB 8100 and the SDA. I know I would rather have a S60 device. The point is that it is really not smart to carry two high end devices that are so closely matched. If they did pick it up that would give them three devices that are really about the same.
Ok so the BB email is WAY BETTER. The SDA does have Wi-Fi and a web browser that is supported by more HTML sites.
Also if you have not noticed, T-Mo is really moving to Samsung, RIM, and Danger for the high end devices. I can not say that I blame them. Everyone here has heard the issues with the RAZR and the Nokia 6101... If they can not get a mid or low end phone right, then how can a customer or a carrier trust them. I am a high end customer (2k f...
(continues)
Ok so the BB email is WAY BETTER. The SDA does have Wi-Fi and a web browser that is supported by more HTML sites.
Also if you have not noticed, T-Mo is really moving to Samsung, RIM, and Danger for the high end devices. I can not say that I blame them. Everyone here has heard the issues with the RAZR and the Nokia 6101... If they can not get a mid or low end phone right, then how can a customer or a carrier trust them. I am a high end customer (2k f...
(continues)
...
The E50 is way better than any Danger device, so is the E61. TMo along with Cingular put their own software/hardware limitations on those phones and screw them up.
Unbranded phones don't have the same issues...
Unbranded phones don't have the same issues...
...
