Motorola Q9m / Q9c
Q9H > Q9M
It would appear that the q9M is the Superior device here. The q9h feature better battery life, better camera, more internal memory (256 vs 64), and wi-fi. Not to mention that it's a GSM/HSDPA 3.6 device!! Eat your heart out verizon!!
...
This is what happens when you let a smartphone and a crippled Verizon Vcast phone have a baby.
Yuck, this thing is terrible.
Yuck, this thing is terrible.
...
🤣 🤣 🤣
shame, shame, shame...
And they claimed THIS was the iPhone killer???? 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
shame, shame, shame...
And they claimed THIS was the iPhone killer???? 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
...
No one claimed that this would be the Iphone killer. An phone simillar to what the Iphone was attempting to be is coming out later this year by LG and Prada.
...
I wouldn't go as far as to say that it is a joke.
It's a pretty nice device (not for me) but I'm sure lots of people love theirs.
It's a pretty nice device (not for me) but I'm sure lots of people love theirs.
...
couple things. i'm not saying which is a better device however: 1.3 vs 2 mp camera in all honesty who cares, i leave my pics on the phone and leaving them on the phone a 1.3 is good enough, battery life, well unfortunatly for cdma the phones wil always have a smaller life due to better security features. as far as integrated wifi, buy the card if you you want it, although i can understand why att users would want wifi, becuase att's highspeed network is a joke and if you want a high speed connction you need wifi. and lastly, the more internal memory is a plus i would like that, but again thats why i has a slot and that way everything you have is backed up.
...
I have the Q9M, for the 100$(after rebate)
its not a bad phone.
Windows Mobile 6, BT2.0, better battery life.
and a nicer keyboard....I like it.
Personally, the Q9M and the Q9C are re-used inventories of the original Q's chipsets, being thrown into a nicer body and and updated OS.
Though technically a "new" product.
The Q9H should have been the only new Q to be released since it's the only true update.
hardware wise its superior to most of whats out there. The iPhone is not a business class product, since it does not have an exchange tie in.
If the iPhone ever got something like the ActiveSync that is in the WM5 and WM6 phones then the iPhone will be killer.
And please dont tell me it already does, IMAP is not the same thing.
its not a bad phone.
Windows Mobile 6, BT2.0, better battery life.
and a nicer keyboard....I like it.
Personally, the Q9M and the Q9C are re-used inventories of the original Q's chipsets, being thrown into a nicer body and and updated OS.
Though technically a "new" product.
The Q9H should have been the only new Q to be released since it's the only true update.
hardware wise its superior to most of whats out there. The iPhone is not a business class product, since it does not have an exchange tie in.
If the iPhone ever got something like the ActiveSync that is in the WM5 and WM6 phones then the iPhone will be killer.
And please dont tell me it already does, IMAP is not the same thing.
...
