![](/img/p/75/475.jpg)
Motorola V710
Punching a gift horse in the mouth
(continues)
and it is only a 100 head piece -- big frickin deal -- can't afford it then you can't afford the phone --
P.S. they are even cheaper on ebey (the headsts)
Roadhawk - I agree with you completly
Do I really need to say this again?
Stop crying about the Promotion!!
THe rules were there...be one of the first to buy -- never said anything about where.....
You lost, deal with it and cough up the 65 bucks on ebay to make up for your bellyaching!!
And one more thing: e-bay is not an acceptable alternative for many. It's still an auction site with concomitant risks (i.e., losing money to unscrupulous sellers, and defective/misrepresented merchandise).
I just think it was a case of "the best laid plans" falling apart and the three entities scrambling to insure everyone would land on their feet.
Personally, I think the whole thing is sort of a waste, but, if for anyone who feels the principle is more important than good quality service, then they SHOULD switch. If I was on the side of "shut out of the contest" and had another service option o...
(continues)
When Motorola says the promotion is going to star after the phone is released (which is officially August 11th) and they launch the promotion the same day Verizon starts selling the phone online @ www.vzwshop.com, that's unfair to people who wanted to buy it from Verizon (the carrier who determines the launch date). Obviously the people who bought it from vzwshop.com aren't going to get the phone for several days an...
(continues)
Remember, Best Buy was giving away a BT headset with each v600 purchased.
It would explain why MOTO went ahead with the promotion -- They would know that the the folks buying the v710 at VZW wouldn't need the "contest" anyway.
npitlor said:
Wouldn't it be "funny" if Verizon was going to start some sort of promotion with the v710s they sell. Say, putting together a package that includes a BT headset, case, and car charger for $50?
Remember, Best Buy was giving away a BT headset with each v600 purchased.
It would explain why MOTO went ahead with the promotion -- They would know that the the folks buying the v710 at VZW wouldn't need the "contest" anyway.
Well according to the V710 launch document Verizon is giving a $20 rebate on the HS820 or the HS800 when purchased from Verizon between August 11th and October 31st. Thanks Verizon! That rebate makes your prices for those items equivalent to the online stores and eBay.
jreisner said:
Would you mind posting the link from that 'launch document'?
They have removed it from public access. It was available for everybody when it was first put on Verizon's site but they've moved it to their intranet. If you send me a note with your email address, I'll email to you tonight when I get home from work. Just click on my name in the header of this message and then you can send me a note with your email address.
Interesting story...I was at the Verizon store yesterday at 57th and 6th in NYC, and the salespeople (three of whom were jealous and none-too-happy with my assessment of the phone being a keeper) advised me that Verizon really tests the sh*t out of their phones...hence the three or four extra months we waited for this release. But what does Motorola think of this delay? I have a feeling everything got crumbled when the product was delivered, finished, from Motorola to Verizon, and Verizon continued to find/create issues. Just knowing Motorola, I don't think they made a mistake and I certainly don't t...
(continues)
1. In the case of the bluetooth promotion, the customer is NOT wrong. If you have a promotion for ALL customers, you need to start everyone off on equal footing -- both from a moral and a legal standpoint. Don't tease people with a free item and them call them whiners (which Motorola didn't) because they want what they were promised.Fair is fair. You can't give some people a head start and call it a fair race. In this case, the blame falls on Motorola. They had a clause in their promotion that says the contest begins when they say it begins. I would find it hard to believe that no one at Motorola knew the launch date for VZW was August 11 and for Radio Shack it was August 1 (or whatever). In that case, they could have...
(continues)
Moto will only respond to a law suit if they have to,and then will spend millions of dollars defending themselves,only to piss of a whole lot of customers.
GOOD LUCK-MAYBE A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT???????????
Heymjo said:...
Two issues here:
1. In the case of the bluetooth promotion, the customer is NOT wrong. If you have a promotion for ALL customers, you need to start everyone off on equal footing -- both from a moral and a legal standpoint. Don't tease people with a free item and them call them whiners (which Motorola didn't) because they want what they were promised.Fair is fair. You can't give some people a head start and call it a fair race. In this case, the blame falls on Motorola. They had a clause in their promotion that says the contest begins when they say it begins. I would find it hard to believe that no one at Motorola knew the launch date for VZW was August 11 and for Radio Shack it was August 1 (or whatever
(continues)
Carlos Caliente said:...Heymjo said:
Two issues here:
1. In the case of the bluetooth promotion, the customer is NOT wrong. If you have a promotion for ALL customers, you need to start everyone off on equal footing -- both from a moral and a legal standpoint. Don't tease people with a free item and them call them whiners (which Motorola didn't) because they want what they were promised.Fair is fair. You can't give some people a head start and call it a fair race. In this case, the blame falls on Motorola. They had a clause in their promotion that says the contest begins when they say it begins. I would find it hard to believe that no one at Motorola knew the launch date for VZW was August 11 and fo
(continues)
(continues)
Heymjo said:...
I would concede that the promotion was fair and equal if RS were selling the phone at the same price as VZW. Burt RS is $100 more. Yes, I know that with a two year contract it is the same price, but some of us don't qualify for a two year because we are in the middle of a NE2. So why would I go to RS and spend $100 more under any circumstances. As far as missing out on the Bluetooth promotion if you bought the phone at RS, how did that happen? Were you too late in registering? Are all 710 accounted for already? Be that as it may, when you announce a promotion for EVERYONE, you need to give everyone a fair shot at it. VZW customers didn't get a fair shot. They should have announced it as a RS promotio
(continues)
(continues)
Heymjo said:...
You were supposed to pre-register with Motorola and they would have sent you E-mail saying the promotion had begun. I got my E-mail, which is how I knew the give-away had begun, even though I need to buy my phone from VZW to get the less expensive price. My point was that since Moto controlled the start date of the promo -- not VZW -- it was within their "power" to start the promo after August 11, the release date with VZW. And don't say they didn't know. Everyone else on the almost-300 pages of this board knew, so Moto had to know. In fact, they didn't start the promo until a few days after RS started selling the phones and people, myself included, wrote and called Moto to tell them that it wasn't avail
(continues)
Heymjo said:...
You were supposed to pre-register with Motorola and they would have sent you E-mail saying the promotion had begun. I got my E-mail, which is how I knew the give-away had begun, even though I need to buy my phone from VZW to get the less expensive price. My point was that since Moto controlled the start date of the promo -- not VZW -- it was within their "power" to start the promo after August 11, the release date with VZW. And don't say they didn't know. Everyone else on the almost-300 pages of this board knew, so Moto had to know. In fact, they didn't start the promo until a few days after RS started selling the phones and people, myself included, wrote and called Moto to tell them that it wasn't avail
(continues)
cr8tonboy said:
Thats how VZW cust service works... customers bitch, bitch, bitch and they get their way. It really ticks me off b/c I work in a VZW store and it ticks me off to see customers be completely wrong about something, call customer service and using their leverage as a "valuable cust." i.e. "i've been with you guys for 3 years," or "i've got 3 phones with you guys" they get their way.. We have 40,000,000 + customers.. do you think we care if joe schmoe w/his 39.99 am choice 400 who dropped his phone in a pool and wants a new phone for free but cant get it, cancels service? hell no.. b/c customers like that end up being more of a problem and cost us money rather then turn us a profit.
Well, pr...
(continues)
When you make a lousy product but support it, you eventually will go out of business (ie you will eventually lose customers to competitors who are cheaper, better and/or treat their customers better). See Lexus and GM.
If you have a great product but treat your customers like crap, you will, likewise, lose much of your customer base.
If you have a great product and charge a fair amount for same and treat your customers fairly, you will be just fine.
Which is where I believe Verizon is.
You're right...for the most part, you won't see a tidal wave of people breaking their Verizon contracts and crushing their CDMA phones under the front tires of their cars; but going down the road of treating the customer ...
(continues)