Motorola Moto X (CDMA, 2nd gen.)
over in the "Verizon's Note 3 Earns Lollipop Update Today" discussion:
It's A Sad Day
It's a sad day when Verizon rolls out an update before at&t.....
The at&t Note 3 isn't going to get Loillipop for several more months, if it ever does at all.
The at&t Note 3 isn't going to get Loillipop for several more months, if it ever does at all.
6 replies
over in the "Google, Motorola Commit to Android Lollipop Upgrades" discussion:
Yeah!
What a good time to be a Moto X owner!
over in the "Review: Motorola Moto X for Verizon Wireless" discussion:
X Marks the Spot
While an excellent high end Motorola device, the Moto G holds its own quite well at a better price point. With an AMOLED display and a slightly better processor, the Moto X is not that much a great difference from the G.
5 replies
over in the "Review: Motorola Moto X for Verizon Wireless" discussion:
Moto X gen. 2 camera timer?
Did they bother to develop a camera timer for snapping remote selfies?
Funny how the old (2 years ago) Droid Razrs had timers.
Funny how the old (2 years ago) Droid Razrs had timers.
over in the "Hands On with the New Moto X" discussion:
disappointing
As I type this from my original moto x I'm saddened to learn Motorola sold out to "bigger".
On the plus side I am glad that they give the option to be done with that annoying " OK Google Now" phrase....I have not used that great voice control feature because of that.
Not sure what the complaint was with the original camera but I thought it was great. I think the twist to activate feature could have activated more quickly but the pics were good.
And to say the original X felt cheap doesn't make sense...I chose it over the LG and Galaxy line because it felt more solid and quality built.
I'll still be getting the new X if it comes to Sprint
On the plus side I am glad that they give the option to be done with that annoying " OK Google Now" phrase....I have not used that great voice control feature because of that.
Not sure what the complaint was with the original camera but I thought it was great. I think the twist to activate feature could have activated more quickly but the pics were good.
And to say the original X felt cheap doesn't make sense...I chose it over the LG and Galaxy line because it felt more solid and quality built.
I'll still be getting the new X if it comes to Sprint
3 replies
over in the "Hands On with the New Moto X" discussion:
Dimple
Is the dimple on the back as deep as it looks in the pics?
On the original X it's such a great thought and position, not intrusive and perfect function
On the original X it's such a great thought and position, not intrusive and perfect function
2 replies
over in the "Hands On with the New Moto X" discussion:
new sample photos
I just added some additional camera samples.
3 replies
over in the "Hands On with the New Moto X" discussion:
Ear piece volume?
My biggest complaint with the original X is the ear piece volume. I cannot get it loud enough to hear clearly in most situations and I have to use the speaker phone. It gets frustrating
Have you had a chance to test the volume? If so, how does it compare to the original?
Have you had a chance to test the volume? If so, how does it compare to the original?
over in the "Motorola Turns Moto X Into True Flagship" discussion:
Gorilla Glass
They say it is Gorilla Glass, but does anyone know which version of Gorilla Glass it is. 1-2-3, ?
over in the "Motorola Turns Moto X Into True Flagship" discussion:
Wish it was smaller :-(
Why are all the flagships HUGE? The old Moto X was almost a perfect size, but really only Sony has bothered to make something usable with one hand this year, the Z3 Compact, that I hope comes to Verizon so I can ignore the Moto X again.
over in the "Motorola Turns Moto X Into True Flagship" discussion:
moto is a good work,support it !
brands of phone in market but i still use this good product,for its powerful useful
