Another god awful CC experience from SprintΓ’βΒ’
I called CC and said I wanted to cancel one of lines. I was not asked for an explanation, and no save attempt was made at all (I've been a customer with them since 2000 and spend over $125 a month). My ONLY request was that the ETF fee be added to my final bill for the one line, and that service NOT be interrupted for the second. The rep says that's not a problem, and then proceeds to disconnect both lines. Apparently he forgot that the ETF would put my account over it's idiotic (and never requested) $200 spending limit (which neve...
(continues)
nodeposit said:
Hey Jackass, the spending limit is never requested, it's based on Credit. If you don't want one, get better credit, and since when do you get to decide how you are billed? I don't know of anywhere else that lets you choose when a fee is to be billed. Welcome to the wireless industry, soon you will be dealing w/ customers that are just as ignorant as you are. Good Luck.
Based on your comprehension of what I posted, you must work for Sprint. Anyway...if I had bad credit, which I don't, why not collect a deposit? I didn't demand to be billed on a specific day, I simply requested that it be added to my next bill, and if that could be done without a service interruption. The CSR said "no pro...
(continues)
they are working on that though.
(continues)
yea, you should see it. look at their numbers for the 1st quarter earnings. increasing in arpu, data arpu, sub growth, lowering churn, and increasing lifetime revenue per user. increasing their bad debt and bad subscribers. which tells us what? THINGS ARE IMPROVING!!!
"Really, imagine if sprint ran credit checks like Verizon, cingular, and Nextel."
actually sprint has the same credit checks like nextel, but not to that extent.
verizon is very laxed and same with cingular.
it will go something like this for most strict.
1. nextel
2. sprint
3. cingular.
4. verizon
thats how it goes. sprint made a mistake with those low...
(continues)
You know that is not true, your statement at the end shows that. If your credit isn't that good (you have to be over $100,000 in debt for that to happen π ) you can pay a uniform $125 deposit.
"verizon is very laxed and same with cingular"
You and everyone on here knows that isn't true either. They ask for deposits up to $1000 bucks. You can get the Cingular one, but they ask for at least $150 if I'm not mistaken.
it will go something like this for most strict.
1. nextel
2. sprint
3. cingular.
4. verizon
That was a complete fabrication. This the order calculated from experiences with carriers:
1.Verizon or Nextel
2.Cingular
3.Tmobile...
(continues)
1.Verizon or Nextel
2.Cingular
3.Tmobile
4.sprint
"
wrong...
verizon and nextel do not have the same credit "strictness" levels.
sprint has increased their "strictness" levels from a while ago.
"Many Nextel contracted consumers are just waiting for Verizon to improve the latency and cingular to launch PTT. When that happens there goes the loyal Nextel cunsumers. "
no. thats not true either. no one is waiting for verizon's new and improve push to talk system. they will never leave nextel. look at the churn and lifetime revenue per user.
yea, they have to wait. it wont work on the rev o system that well so they want to use it over the rev a system.
kodiak will not be better then qchat. qchat is at 1.5 seconds and thats just right now, and kodiak is at 2-3 seconds and wont improve. thats what they are at. it wont go down it will probably go up. (the latency that is) when it goes onto the gsm or cdma network (push to talk solutions) it becomes slower. motorola's ptt solution that i belive verizon and sprint used was very good and they had huge latency when they put it on their networks.
cingular wont do well. alltel has it and theirs isnt that great, and nextel partners serves in their markets and they been stealing customers and saying there ar...
(continues)
i dont have to try ready link becuase i have nextel. (but i might, but we will see)
i am not interested in ready link as much as i am interested in qchat.
judog2g said:
That was a complete fabrication. This the order calculated from experiences with carriers:
1.Verizon or Nextel
2.Cingular
3.Tmobile
4.sprint
I agree.
No credit whatsoever (completely no history)?
Verizon deposit = $1000
Cingular deposit = $500
Sprint deposit = $150
This I know. As for Nextel I couldn't say.
(continues)
nodeposit said:...
Never said you had bad credit. Apparently it's not good enough to not have a spending limit though. The ETF was added to your next bill, and then your bill posted. When your bill posts, it's due. It posts at the beginning of your billing cycle. When it posts, if it's over your spending limit, regardless of whether you request it or not, you get shut off. The CSR should not have told you no problem but Sprint didn't **** everything up, they did what they were supposed to do. How about you get on a forum and complain about the CSR who lied to you rather than a company that did nothing out of the ordinary. Just cause we don't do everything people want doesn't mean we have poor customer service.
(continues)
... and this is the reason why when I moved I didn't go with Sprint, who has excellent service in Philly, and went with Verizon instead.
WOW... and to think you have a job.
People threaten crap all the time about switching to other carriers so they can get free phones...of course you can when you first sign up...Sprint does that too. What people need to look at when they sign up for ...
(continues)
vzw_achiever said:
Did you eat a lot of paint chips when you were a kid?
what? you mean wallcandy?!?
Every day I average 30 calls from customers complaining about what a CC rep told them. It happens enough for me to say there is a problem company wide. I hoestly wonder about their training or coaching... or lack thereof.
I love the "Don't blame the company for one rep" line. I speak to plenty of people every day. I know it's more than one rep making the company bad.
jkrivjansky said:
In all honesty it doesn't surprise me this happened. I can account for the fact many CC reps for Sprint make completely idiotic promises to customers.
Every day I average 30 calls from customers complaining about what a CC rep told them. It happens enough for me to say there is a problem company wide. I hoestly wonder about their training or coaching... or lack thereof.
I love the "Don't blame the company for one rep" line. I speak to plenty of people every day. I know it's more than one rep making the company bad.
What a brave soul. Thank you for your testimony! The truth is they are coached to lie. Too many experiences to bring one up.
judog2g said:
What a brave soul. Thank you for your testimony! The truth is they are coached to lie. Too many experiences to bring one up.
I won't go so far as to say they are coached to lie. I will say many of them are either lazy or grossly misinformed.
I have one specific case where a rep asked me if what they were told was correct. I informed them it wasn't. It's not necessarily a lie if the rep doesn't know any different.
This is coming from a long time customer and also a former rep. I try not to call at all! Basic feature changes are screwed up and then nothing will be right for months.
(continues)
TommyBoy said:...
When I worked as a csr in a retail center I couldnt get a straight answer from ANYONE. Even my store manager. I HAD to do my own research to get the right info. I can't tell you how many times I had to educate my ENTIRE team (managers too) on how to basic processes. Vzw is another world completly. All though there are a few reps that manage to stick around somehow and screw up things on peoples bills vzw does a pretty good job at weeding them out. If you are a customer that gets screwed over on something like this a good thing to do is send a flag up to the company about it. Seek out management and let them know whats going on. EVEN if the manager didn't know the policy or the correct info he has to researc
(continues)
As for your ETF being on the next bill: that would only be possible if the phone is expired at that billing cycle. If the line is terminated effective immediately it is also charged immediately. If the line is set to expire on a ...
(continues)