Motorola Moto X Pure Edition / Style
Info
Photos
News
Forum
Reviews 4
over in the "Republic Wireless Improves Android Lineup" discussion:
Awesome...
I was hoping they would add new handsets or the ability to just buy a sim if you already have one of those, and nobody can beat Republics plans for $15 or $20. Not Straight Talk, not Cricket, and not Metro. Ting is debatable but they charge more than republic for a gig of data so we shall see come August.
over in the "Republic Wireless Improves Android Lineup" discussion:
I KNOW THEY HAVE A GOOD FOLLOWING...BUT.....
How are they going to compete with the national carriers? Sorry but AFFIRM is a RIP OFF, you would be better off going to straight talk, cricket, metro, etc...
en102Jan 23, 2016, 6:36 PM
over in the "Review: Motorola Moto X Pure Edition" discussion:
Awesome device!
After my Nexus 6 grew legs, I needed a replacement - and quick.
T-Mo only had LG/Samsung/Apple devices (ugh), which were either expensive or older.
Best Buy had the MotoX Pure in their unlocked section, and at $450 it was a better deal than anything T-Mo was peddling.
Pros: Awesome 1440x2560 screen (gorilla glass) and VERY bright
Fast - much faster than my Nexus 6
Camera - very nice
Supports T-Mo HD voice (even though not listed on here)
Turbo Charging
Loud speakers
Cons: Motorola still around ?
Not many accessories
Not sold for any carrier directly
over in the "Review: Motorola Moto X Pure Edition" discussion:
Moto x pure - terrible tech support
Terrible experience.The new Moto x pure would not synch properly, would not connect to web while on a phone call, was missing option to remove accounts, etc. Spent hours mostly on hold with tech support which is in el Salvador. Spoke to half a dozen reps, they are illiterate technologically (for example: suggested that the best way to back up photos is to email them to myself), don't know basic phone functions, have bad attitude, lied promising to send email with instructions to correct issues, or to call in an hour, didn't have any answers so intentionally lowered voice when were asked to speak up, told me that they are just making the phones and if applications are not working I need to talk to Google or Verizon.
After doing my own resea...
(continues)
Moto X Pure Bands
I think you are displaying the Moto X Style bands. The bands supported for the Moto X Pure are:
GSM/GPRS/EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz)
UMTS/HSPA (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz)
CDMA (800, 850, 1900 MHz)
4G LTE (B1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 25, 26, 38, 41)
Which makes it compatible with Sprint Spark (and potentially Project Fi).
Jim
4 replies
over in the "Lenovo to Slash 3,200 Jobs After Motorola Sales Slide" discussion:
Donald trump
needs to come in and fire the entire design staff....
I don't think it's a lack of innovation because Moto has some of the best features available but they are now some of the crap ugliest phones.
over in the "Lenovo to Slash 3,200 Jobs After Motorola Sales Slide" discussion:
Motorola
Motorola used to be the big dog, along with Nokia back in the day. Now Nokia is no longer and Motorola has one foot in the grave too. Google really f'd up Moto when they took it over. They raided their patents like some pirates and then sold the scraps to wolves. Motorola needs to come out with something innovative, but I doubt that will happen now that it's not an independent company. Stop copying Apple too with non removable batteries. Samsung is copying Apple and that's not a good thing. People buy Android because they don't want Apple, so why would they buy an Apple clone Android device like Motorola or Samsung?
over in the "Liveblog of Motorola 2015 Event" discussion:
Water Proof
Is The Moto X Play Water Proof Too Like Moto G (3rd Ger.)
over in the "Hands On with the Moto X" discussion:
Farewell Motorla
I absolutely detest Lenovo's design implementation, so cookie-cutter like their computers. Motorola had a very nice style to their Moto X designs.
I don't personally like this design at all.
And making the Pure edition only available in 5.7" is a bad idea too.
2 replies
SamsJul 28, 2015, 12:50 PM
over in the "Motorola Reveals the Moto X Style" discussion:
5.7" Screen? Answer to the question no one asked
Sounds like a great device, but that huge screen is a big NO NO for me - and for thousands others as well. At least introduce a "mini" version (like 4.7" 1080p screen), but all the same specs as the bigger flagship.
I had several Motorola phones in the past, I was looking forward to continue with that brand (especially that the migrate option makes it so easy to switch to a new phone), but too bad. I am not a phablet fan. So good bye Moto, you lost me.
over in the "Liveblog of Motorola 2015 Event" discussion:
5.7"? Are they crazy?
Have they learned nothing from the Nexus 6 debacle?